You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Read (Walter A.) v. Prothonotary Bane (Margo Ewing), Capano (Deborah H.), Ogonowski (Rita), Fleetwood (Susan), Sylvestrzuk (Keith), Nichols (Robert), Burris (Edward), Capitol Police Department, Stoner (Ronald L., Sgt.), School (Frank), Krajewski (Joseph), Davis (Roger), Wilmington Police Dept., Pennell (Joseph), Ghecas (Marilou A.), Longobardi (Joseph J., Hon.), Disabatino (Arthur F., Hon.)

Citations: 882 F.2d 512; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11331; 1989 WL 88077Docket: 89-3103

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; July 12, 1989; Federal Appellate Court

EnglishEspañolSimplified EnglishEspañol Fácil
Walter A. Read appealed against multiple defendants, including Margo Ewing, Deborah H. Capano, Rita Ogonowski, Susan Fleetwood, Keith Sylvestrzuk, Robert Nichols, Edward Burris, Ronald L. Stoner, Frank School, Joseph Krajewski, Roger Davis, the Wilmington Police Department, Joseph Pennell, Marilou A. Ghecas, Joseph J. Longobardi, and Hon. Arthur F. Disabatino. The appeal was heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit under case number 89-3103, with the decision rendered on July 12, 1989. The Court affirmed the ruling of the District Court for Delaware, presided over by Judge Farnan. The details of the underlying case, claims, or legal issues are not specified in the provided information, but the affirmation indicates that the appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's decision.