Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
McCray v. State
Citations: 29 S.W.3d 398; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1557; 2000 WL 1528931Docket: No. ED 77664
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals; October 17, 2000; Missouri; State Appellate Court
Jesse McCray's appeal of the motion court's judgment, which denied his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing, has been reviewed. The appellate court found the claims of error presented by McCray to be without merit. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were determined to not be clearly erroneous. An extended opinion detailing the facts and legal principles was deemed unnecessary as it would lack precedential value. Consequently, the motion court’s judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum outlining the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties for informational purposes.