Narrative Opinion Summary
Defendant Michael Duke appeals his conviction for attempted first degree murder under Section 564.011 and driving while intoxicated under Section 577.010. The case was bench-tried. After reviewing the parties' briefs, the transcript, and the legal file, the court found no legal errors. A detailed opinion is deemed unnecessary, leading to an affirmation of the judgment through a summary order, in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Judgment under Rule 30.25(b)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court affirmed the judgment of conviction without issuing a detailed opinion, using a summary order as permitted by Rule 30.25(b).
Reasoning: A detailed opinion is deemed unnecessary, leading to an affirmation of the judgment through a summary order, in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Appeal in Bench Trialsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The defendant's appeal of his convictions was considered by reviewing the parties' briefs, transcript, and legal file, which revealed no legal errors.
Reasoning: The case was bench-tried. After reviewing the parties' briefs, the transcript, and the legal file, the court found no legal errors.