You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re Rubenstein

Citations: 830 A.2d 956; 574 Pa. 330; 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1695Docket: No. 41 DB 2003

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; August 1, 2003; Pennsylvania; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania approved the Report and Recommendations from the Disciplinary Board dated June 25, 2003. Barry J. Rubenstein, previously on inactive status and not having faced suspension or disbarment, has demonstrated the necessary moral qualifications, competency, and legal knowledge for practice in Pennsylvania. Consequently, he is reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar. Additionally, Rubenstein is responsible for covering the expenses incurred by the Board during the investigation and processing of his Petition for Reinstatement.

Legal Issues Addressed

Reinstatement to Active Status in the Bar

Application: The court reinstated an attorney to active status after determining he met the necessary qualifications following a period of inactive status.

Reasoning: Barry J. Rubenstein, previously on inactive status and not having faced suspension or disbarment, has demonstrated the necessary moral qualifications, competency, and legal knowledge for practice in Pennsylvania.

Responsibility for Costs in Reinstatement Proceedings

Application: An attorney seeking reinstatement is required to bear the costs associated with the investigation and processing of their reinstatement petition.

Reasoning: Additionally, Rubenstein is responsible for covering the expenses incurred by the Board during the investigation and processing of his Petition for Reinstatement.