You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

WILLIAM FENNELL PITTMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-1710

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 24, 2021; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

William Fennell Pitman appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Polk County, presided over by Judge Michael P. McDaniel. The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the lower court's ruling. The appeal was evaluated under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) and referenced statutory provisions and case law, including Florida Statutes Section 775.082(9)(a)(3), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(i), and multiple precedent cases such as Richardson v. State, State v. Baker, and others. Judges Casanueva, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson concurred with the decision. The opinion is noted to be subject to revision prior to official publication.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Rulings

Application: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Appellate Review under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)

Application: The appellate court evaluated the appeal in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain procedural aspects of appellate review.

Reasoning: The appeal was evaluated under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)...

Consideration of Statutory Provisions in Appeals

Application: The case referenced specific statutory provisions, including Florida Statutes Section 775.082(9)(a)(3), during the appeal process.

Reasoning: ...referenced statutory provisions and case law, including Florida Statutes Section 775.082(9)(a)(3)...

Judicial Concurrence in Appellate Decisions

Application: Judges Casanueva, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson all concurred with the appellate court's decision to affirm the lower court's ruling.

Reasoning: Judges Casanueva, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson concurred with the decision.

Role of Precedent in Appellate Decisions

Application: The appellate court considered multiple precedent cases such as Richardson v. State and State v. Baker in reaching its decision.

Reasoning: ...and multiple precedent cases such as Richardson v. State, State v. Baker, and others.