Narrative Opinion Summary
William Fennell Pitman appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Polk County, presided over by Judge Michael P. McDaniel. The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the lower court's ruling. The appeal was evaluated under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) and referenced statutory provisions and case law, including Florida Statutes Section 775.082(9)(a)(3), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(i), and multiple precedent cases such as Richardson v. State, State v. Baker, and others. Judges Casanueva, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson concurred with the decision. The opinion is noted to be subject to revision prior to official publication.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court Rulingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Polk County.
Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the lower court's ruling.
Appellate Review under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court evaluated the appeal in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain procedural aspects of appellate review.
Reasoning: The appeal was evaluated under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)...
Consideration of Statutory Provisions in Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case referenced specific statutory provisions, including Florida Statutes Section 775.082(9)(a)(3), during the appeal process.
Reasoning: ...referenced statutory provisions and case law, including Florida Statutes Section 775.082(9)(a)(3)...
Judicial Concurrence in Appellate Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Judges Casanueva, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson all concurred with the appellate court's decision to affirm the lower court's ruling.
Reasoning: Judges Casanueva, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson concurred with the decision.
Role of Precedent in Appellate Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court considered multiple precedent cases such as Richardson v. State and State v. Baker in reaching its decision.
Reasoning: ...and multiple precedent cases such as Richardson v. State, State v. Baker, and others.