You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re Aversa

Citations: 746 A.2d 563; 560 Pa. 448Docket: No. 99 DB 1999

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; January 19, 2000; Pennsylvania; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

On January 20, 2000, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania approved the Report and Recommendations from The Disciplinary Board dated December 15, 1999. Robert D. Aversa, who has been inactive but has never faced suspension or disbarment, demonstrated the necessary moral qualifications, competency, and legal knowledge for practicing law. Consequently, he is reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of Pennsylvania. Additionally, Aversa is responsible for covering the expenses incurred by the Board during the investigation and processing of his Petition for Reinstatement.

Legal Issues Addressed

Reinstatement to Active Status in the Bar

Application: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reinstated Robert D. Aversa to active status after finding that he demonstrated the necessary moral qualifications, competency, and legal knowledge required for practicing law.

Reasoning: Robert D. Aversa, who has been inactive but has never faced suspension or disbarment, demonstrated the necessary moral qualifications, competency, and legal knowledge for practicing law. Consequently, he is reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of Pennsylvania.

Responsibility for Costs in Reinstatement Proceedings

Application: Robert D. Aversa is held responsible for covering the expenses incurred by the Disciplinary Board during the investigation and processing of his Petition for Reinstatement.

Reasoning: Additionally, Aversa is responsible for covering the expenses incurred by the Board during the investigation and processing of his Petition for Reinstatement.