You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State v. MacArthur

Citations: 458 A.2d 417; 1983 Me. LEXIS 671

Court: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine; April 7, 1983; Maine; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Defendant was charged with Class B Burglary on September 20, 1982. Prior to the probable cause hearing, the defendant filed a motion to suppress physical and testimonial evidence, citing violations of constitutional rights. The State subsequently moved to dismiss the suppression hearing, claiming the District Court lacked jurisdiction. The court denied this motion, suppressed the defendant's statements, and found no probable cause. The State appealed the court’s pre-trial order. The appeal was sustained, with the conclusion that the District Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suppression motion for a Class B offense, as there is no statutory or procedural basis for such jurisdiction under Maine law. The suppression order was vacated, although it was noted that the District Court could still make evidentiary rulings during a probable cause hearing, which differs from a suppression order that affects the admissibility of evidence in future proceedings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Distinction between Suppression Orders and Evidentiary Rulings

Application: The court noted the difference between suppression orders, which affect future admissibility of evidence, and evidentiary rulings made during a probable cause hearing.

Reasoning: The suppression order was vacated, although it was noted that the District Court could still make evidentiary rulings during a probable cause hearing, which differs from a suppression order that affects the admissibility of evidence in future proceedings.

Jurisdiction of District Court in Suppression Hearings

Application: The District Court was found to lack jurisdiction to entertain a suppression motion for a Class B offense, as there is no statutory or procedural basis under Maine law.

Reasoning: The appeal was sustained, with the conclusion that the District Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suppression motion for a Class B offense, as there is no statutory or procedural basis for such jurisdiction under Maine law.