Narrative Opinion Summary
The court convened on March 6, 1980, to consider the defendants' motion under Rule 16(g) to affirm the lower court's judgment, which vacated a lis pendens filed by the plaintiff against land owned by some defendants. After reviewing the arguments and the plaintiff's brief, the court concluded that the plaintiff's action did not warrant the filing of a lis pendens. Consequently, the motion to affirm the lower court’s judgment was granted. Justice Doris did not participate in the decision.
Legal Issues Addressed
Lis Pendens Requirementssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that the plaintiff's action did not justify the filing of a lis pendens, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision to vacate it.
Reasoning: The court concluded that the plaintiff's action did not warrant the filing of a lis pendens.
Rule 16(g) Motion to Affirm Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The defendants successfully utilized a Rule 16(g) motion to affirm the lower court's judgment, which had vacated the lis pendens initially filed by the plaintiff.
Reasoning: The court convened on March 6, 1980, to consider the defendants' motion under Rule 16(g) to affirm the lower court's judgment, which vacated a lis pendens filed by the plaintiff against land owned by some defendants.