You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Mississippi Bar v. Galloway

Citations: 118 So. 3d 540; 2012 WL 309325Docket: No. 2011-BD-01140-SCT

Court: Mississippi Supreme Court; February 1, 2012; Mississippi; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves the disbarment of an attorney following a felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance, resulting in an eight-year sentence, later reduced to probation. The Mississippi Bar petitioned for the attorney's removal from the Bar rolls, leading to a disciplinary procedure overseen by the Mississippi Supreme Court. The attorney did not appeal the conviction nor formally contest the Bar's complaint, although she communicated her intention not to oppose it. Exercising exclusive jurisdiction, the court conducted a de novo review and determined that the Bar had adequately demonstrated misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. Consequently, the court ordered the attorney's disbarment under Mississippi Rules of Discipline 6(a) and 6(d), mandating her to notify clients, manage trust accounts, and fulfill other post-disbarment obligations within specified timeframes. The court also ordered the attorney to bear the costs of the proceedings. The disbarment underscores the court's commitment to upholding professional standards in the legal community.

Legal Issues Addressed

Disbarment Following Felony Conviction

Application: The court disbarred the attorney due to a felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance, which satisfies the criteria under the Mississippi Rules of Discipline.

Reasoning: Randy Grant Pierce, Justice, issued an Order of Disbarment concerning Brandon Leigh Galloway, who has been convicted of a felony.

Jurisdiction Over Attorney Discipline

Application: The court emphasized its exclusive jurisdiction over attorney discipline and applied a de novo review standard, requiring the Bar to prove misconduct by clear and convincing evidence.

Reasoning: The Court emphasized its exclusive jurisdiction over attorney discipline, requiring a de novo review standard and the Bar to prove misconduct by clear and convincing evidence.

Notification and Compliance Obligations Post-Disbarment

Application: The disbarred attorney must notify clients and relevant courts, manage trust funds, and fulfill obligations under Rule 11 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline.

Reasoning: Galloway is required to notify her clients and the relevant courts of her disbarment within thirty days, manage any trust funds appropriately, and fulfill all obligations outlined in Rule 11 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline.

Procedural Requirements for Disbarment

Application: The attorney's failure to contest the complaint and her written acknowledgment facilitated the Court's decision to disbar her under MRD 6(a) and 6(d).

Reasoning: Galloway's undisputed conviction and her written acknowledgment of the complaint led to the conclusion that disbarment is warranted, as per MRD 6(a) and 6(d).