You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Arnaldo Mancebo v. American Airlines Group and Sedgwick SMS

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-0748

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 10, 2021; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Arnaldo Mancebo appealed an order from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims involving American Airlines Group and Sedgwick SMS, concerning a workplace incident that occurred on December 14, 2018. The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision on September 10, 2021. The ruling was issued per curiam, with Judges Lewis, B.L. Thomas, and Bilbrey concurring. The decision is not final and is subject to possible motions under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331. Representation for the appellant was provided by Bill McCabe, while the appellees were represented by Michael Antonio Hernandez and Anthony Forte.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appeal of Compensation Claims

Application: The appellant, Arnaldo Mancebo, challenged an order related to a workplace incident involving American Airlines Group and Sedgwick SMS. The appellate court upheld the decision of the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims.

Reasoning: Arnaldo Mancebo appealed an order from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims involving American Airlines Group and Sedgwick SMS, concerning a workplace incident that occurred on December 14, 2018.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The appellate court's decision is not considered final and may be subject to further motions as permitted by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Reasoning: The decision is not final and is subject to possible motions under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Per Curiam Decisions

Application: The First District Court of Appeal of Florida issued its decision per curiam, indicating a unanimous agreement among the judges without a detailed opinion.

Reasoning: The ruling was issued per curiam, with Judges Lewis, B.L. Thomas, and Bilbrey concurring.