You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Citation: Not availableDocket: 20-0672

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 8, 2021; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

William Routenberg appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, with the case being presided over by Judge Joseph A. Bulone. The appeal was brought under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the lower court's ruling without providing a detailed opinion. Justices Khouzam, Black, and Labrit concurred with the decision. The opinion is subject to revision before its official publication.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court’s Ruling Without Opinion

Application: The appellate court confirmed the decision of the lower court without issuing a detailed opinion on the matter.

Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the lower court's ruling without providing a detailed opinion.

Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)

Application: The appellant brought the case to the appellate court following the specific procedural guideline outlined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Reasoning: The appeal was brought under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Concurrence of Justices in Appellate Decision

Application: The decision to affirm the lower court's ruling was agreed upon by all the presiding justices of the appellate court.

Reasoning: Justices Khouzam, Black, and Labrit concurred with the decision.