You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

City of Lafayette v. Wofford

Citations: 84 So. 3d 687; 11 La.App. 3 Cir. 988; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 111; 2012 WL 280666Docket: No. 11-988

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; January 31, 2012; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the defendant, arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, entered a pretrial diversion program and sought to expunge his arrest records. The trial court granted the expungement, which the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPS) contested, arguing it violated La.R.S. 15:578.1, which requires certain records to remain public for five years. The appeal centered around the interpretation of La.R.S. 15:242 and 15:578.1 concerning expungement eligibility, emphasizing that only specific arrest and conviction records may be expunged under La.R.S. 44:9. The appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision, noting that the statute of limitations had not expired, and no charges had been formally dismissed. Additionally, the court clarified that the expungement request should have been filed in the appropriate court. All costs were assigned to the defendant. The ruling underscored the complexity of Louisiana's expungement statutes, affirming the constitutionality of La.R.S. 15:578.1 while referencing prior decisions, such as State v. Bradley, which impacted the interpretation of these laws.

Legal Issues Addressed

Constitutionality of La.R.S. 44:9

Application: The constitutionality of La.R.S. 44:9 was upheld in prior case law, but the final sentence of La.R.S. 44:9(A)(2) was declared unconstitutional in State v. Bradley.

Reasoning: The final sentence of La.R.S. 44:9(A)(2) was deemed unconstitutional in State v. Bradley, 360 So.2d 858 (La.1978).

Eligibility for Expungement under La.R.S. 44:9

Application: The court found that expungement under La.R.S. 44:9 is not available for certain DUI offenses, and the defendant's request was denied due to the statute of limitations not expiring.

Reasoning: However, expungement is not available for certain DUI offenses. In a specific case, the defendant's request for expungement was denied because the statute of limitations for prosecution had not expired at the time of the trial court's decision.

Expungement of Arrest Records under La.R.S. 15:578.1

Application: The appellate court held that the trial court erred in ordering the expungement of the defendant's arrest records, as La.R.S. 15:578.1 does not permit expungement of certain records within a five-year period.

Reasoning: DPS appealed, arguing that the expungement violated La.R.S. 15:578.1, which mandates that certain records remain public for five years and are not eligible for expungement during that period.

Jurisdiction for Filing Expungement Petitions

Application: The opinion noted that the petition for expungement should be filed in the appropriate district, parish, or city court, and there was confusion regarding the jurisdiction in the present case.

Reasoning: La.R.S. 44:9(A)(1) stipulates that a defendant must petition for expungement in the appropriate district, parish, or city court where the violation was prosecuted or where the arrest occurred.