Narrative Opinion Summary
Computer Products and Services, Inc. appeals the trial court's directed verdict and final judgment favoring Pomeroy Select Integration Solutions, Inc. The appellate court finds the appellant's arguments regarding the choice of law unconvincing and affirms the trial court's decision. Additionally, the court upholds the directed verdict in favor of the appellee, referencing the authority of a prior case, James Crystal Licenses, LLC v. Infinity Radio Inc. The ruling is affirmed with concurrence from Judges Polen, May, and Associate Judge Gates.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of Directed Verdictssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's directed verdict in favor of the appellee, indicating that the trial court did not err in its judgment.
Reasoning: The appellate court finds the appellant's arguments regarding the choice of law unconvincing and affirms the trial court's decision.
Choice of Law in Contract Disputessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellant's arguments concerning the choice of law were found to be without merit, leading to the affirmation of the trial court's decision.
Reasoning: The appellate court finds the appellant's arguments regarding the choice of law unconvincing and affirms the trial court's decision.
Precedential Authority in Appellate Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court referenced a prior case, James Crystal Licenses, LLC v. Infinity Radio Inc., to support its decision to uphold the directed verdict.
Reasoning: Additionally, the court upholds the directed verdict in favor of the appellee, referencing the authority of a prior case, James Crystal Licenses, LLC v. Infinity Radio Inc.