You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Agilus Health v. Dresser, Inc.

Citations: 36 So. 3d 388; 10 La.App. 3 Cir. 315; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 546; 2010 WL 1460046Docket: No. 10-315

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; April 14, 2010; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a workers’ compensation case, Agilus Health, Inc. moved to dismiss a suspensive appeal filed by Dresser, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, arguing untimely bond posting. The Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) initially ruled against the appellants, mandating payments of $23.40 for underpaid health care bills, a $2,000 penalty, and $3,000 in attorney fees following an injury to James Wilbanks. The judgment was signed on January 14, 2010, with notice provided the same day. The appellants appealed on February 4, 2010, and requested a bond amount, which was set at $5,352.00 on February 10, 2010. They posted the bond on March 2, 2010. Agilus contended this was beyond the thirty days required by La. Code Civ. P. 2123 from the final judgment notice. However, the court found the bond posting timely, referencing statutory compliance with La. R.S. 23:1310.5 and a similar precedent. Judge David E. Chatelain, serving as Judge Pro Tempore, participated in the decision to deny the appellee's motion, maintaining the suspensive nature of the appeal.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appeal Procedures and Bond Requirements

Application: The appellants filed a motion for appeal and requested the bond setting within the statutory timeframe, which was eventually posted according to the notice of bond amount.

Reasoning: The appellants filed their motion for appeal on February 4, 2010, which was granted the same day, along with a request to set the bond for the suspensive appeal.

Timeliness of Appeal Bond Posting under La. R.S. 23:1310.5

Application: The court found that the appellants' bond posting was timely as it was in accordance with the statutory requirements, aligning with the notice of the bond amount setting.

Reasoning: The court found that the bond was posted in accordance with La. R.S. 23:1310.5, determining it was timely.

Workers’ Compensation Judgment and Penalties

Application: The WCJ ruled against the appellants, requiring them to pay for underpaid health care bills, a statutory penalty, and attorney fees.

Reasoning: A workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) had previously ruled against the appellants, ordering them to pay Agilus $23.40 for underpaid health care bills related to James Wilbanks’ work injury, along with a $2,000 statutory penalty and $3,000 in attorney fees.