You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Land v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Citations: 212 So. 3d 1166; 2017 La. LEXIS 531Docket: NO. 2017-CC-0109

Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana; March 13, 2017; Louisiana; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the appellate court dealt with a dissenting opinion concerning a slip-and-fall incident involving defendants, including a major retail store and associated parties. The primary legal issue revolved around the trial court's decision to grant a new trial after a jury had ruled in favor of the defendants. The trial court's discretion in granting new trials was challenged, particularly its assessment of witness credibility and the evidence presented. Justice Crichton dissented from the court's decision not to grant a writ application, arguing for a remand to the court of appeal for a thorough review of the trial transcript and the trial court's decision. The dissent criticized the court of appeal for dismissing the writ application without adequate record review, potentially overlooking an abuse of discretion by the trial court. The opinion highlighted that, under Louisiana law, motions for new trials are procedural and not appealable, emphasizing the importance of supervisory writs in such cases. The outcome underscored the procedural nuances and discretionary limits in judicial review of new trial motions.

Legal Issues Addressed

Discretion in Granting New Trials

Application: The trial court has the discretion to grant a new trial, but this is limited and cannot be used to overturn a jury's verdict without reasonable grounds.

Reasoning: The discretion to grant or deny a motion for a new trial lies with the trial court, but this discretion has limits.

Interlocutory Orders and Appellate Review

Application: An order for a new trial is interlocutory and not appealable, but it can be reviewed for abuse of discretion under the appellate courts’ supervisory jurisdiction.

Reasoning: The dissent further clarifies that an order for a new trial is interlocutory and not appealable, but can be reviewed for abuse of discretion under the appellate courts’ supervisory jurisdiction.

Review of Jury Verdicts

Application: A trial judge cannot overturn a jury verdict simply because they disagree with it if the verdict is supported by any reasonable interpretation of the evidence.

Reasoning: While a trial judge can assess evidence and witness credibility, they cannot overturn a jury verdict simply because they disagree with it, especially if the verdict is supported by any reasonable interpretation of the evidence, as established in Martin v. Heritage Manor.

Supervisory Writs in Procedural Matters

Application: Defendants should seek a supervisory writ for procedural matters like motions for new trials, which are not subject to appeal under Louisiana law.

Reasoning: The dissent emphasizes that defendants should seek a supervisory writ, as motions for new trials are procedural and not subject to appeal under Louisiana law.