You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Meladine v. Energy

Citations: 211 So. 3d 391; 2016 La. LEXIS 2709Docket: NO. 2016-C-1450

Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana; December 15, 2016; Louisiana; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Writ of Certiorari and/or Review was applied for in the Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court Div. B, case No. 48-436, subsequently reviewed by the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, case No. 2015-CA-1068. The court granted the writ, reversing the lower court's decision to grant summary judgment. It determined that genuine issues of material fact exist, preventing the proper application of summary judgment as a matter of law. The case has been remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Justices WEIMER, GUIDRY, and CLARK expressed dissenting opinions, each indicating they would deny the writ.

Legal Issues Addressed

Dissent in Judicial Opinions

Application: Certain justices disagreed with the majority's decision to grant the writ, indicating a preference to uphold the original ruling.

Reasoning: Justices WEIMER, GUIDRY, and CLARK expressed dissenting opinions, each indicating they would deny the writ.

Existence of Genuine Issues of Material Fact

Application: The court found that unresolved factual disputes must be addressed, which precludes the granting of summary judgment as a legal conclusion.

Reasoning: It determined that genuine issues of material fact exist, preventing the proper application of summary judgment as a matter of law.

Remand for Further Proceedings

Application: Upon finding errors in the lower court's decision, the case is sent back to the district court for additional examination and proceedings.

Reasoning: The case has been remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Review of Summary Judgment Decisions

Application: The appellate court reviews the lower court's decision to grant summary judgment and determines whether genuine issues of material fact exist, impacting the appropriateness of summary judgment.

Reasoning: The court granted the writ, reversing the lower court's decision to grant summary judgment.