Narrative Opinion Summary
In the case "In re 100 Fresenius Clinic," several entities associated with Fresenius Medical Care, including Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc., and Fresenius USA, are the defendants. They applied for supervisory and/or remedial writs related to a matter from the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, case number 631586. The Court of Appeal, First Circuit, reviewed the application under docket number 2016 CW 0201 and ultimately denied the writs. However, Justices Johnson and Weimer expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating they would have granted the application.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dissenting Judicial Opinionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justices Johnson and Weimer dissented from the majority decision, indicating they would have granted the application for writs.
Reasoning: However, Justices Johnson and Weimer expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating they would have granted the application.
Supervisory and Remedial Writssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reviewed and denied the defendants' application for supervisory and/or remedial writs in a case from the 19th Judicial District Court.
Reasoning: The Court of Appeal, First Circuit, reviewed the application under docket number 2016 CW 0201 and ultimately denied the writs.