Narrative Opinion Summary
Suzette Rivera appeals the trial court's Order that denied her Motion to Vacate and Set Aside a Void Default Judgment against Hector Rivera, as well as her Motion to Intervene on behalf of Hector. The appellate court affirms the trial court's order regarding the denial of the motion to intervene. Additionally, the court dismisses the appeal concerning the denial of her motion to vacate due to a lack of jurisdiction. The decision is affirmed in part and dismissed in part, with Judges Orfinger, Evander, and Cohen concurring.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Motion to Intervenesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision to deny Suzette Rivera's motion to intervene on behalf of Hector Rivera.
Reasoning: The appellate court affirms the trial court's order regarding the denial of the motion to intervene.
Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdictionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court dismissed the appeal concerning the denial of Suzette Rivera's motion to vacate due to the court lacking jurisdiction to review the matter.
Reasoning: Additionally, the court dismisses the appeal concerning the denial of her motion to vacate due to a lack of jurisdiction.