You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

New Jerusalem Church of God, Inc. v. Sneads Community Church, Inc.

Citations: 147 So. 3d 25; 2013 WL 4859091; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14558Docket: No. 1D12-2603

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 12, 2013; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a dispute over the ownership of church property between Sneads Community Church, Inc. (SCC) and New Jerusalem Church of God, Inc. (NJC, Inc.). NJC, Inc., which operates as a hierarchical church, appealed a trial court decision favoring SCC, contending that the court improperly denied its motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). NJC, Inc. argued that the property was held under its hierarchical structure, which the trial court failed to recognize. The court of appeal agreed with NJC, Inc., reversing the trial court's decision and directing that judgment be entered in favor of NJC, Inc. The case centered on whether NJC, Sneads was affiliated with NJC, Inc. and thus subject to its hierarchical property rules. The appellate court applied Florida's deference approach to church property disputes, which mandates deference to the authority of hierarchical church tribunals. By affirming NJC, Inc.'s hierarchical status and its entitlement to the property, the decision underscores the legal principle that local congregations cannot retain property upon disaffiliation from a hierarchical church. The final judgment was reversed, recognizing NJC, Inc.'s authority over the disputed property.

Legal Issues Addressed

Deference to Hierarchical Church Authority

Application: The court applied the deference approach, recognizing NJC, Inc.'s hierarchical church status, which required the trial court to defer to NJC, Inc.'s decisions regarding property ownership.

Reasoning: Florida applies a deference to church authority approach in church property disputes, as established in Mills and further clarified in Townsend v. Teagle.

Directed Verdict and Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV)

Application: The appellate court reversed the trial court’s denial of NJC, Inc.'s motions for a directed verdict and JNOV, as the court was legally required to acknowledge NJC, Inc.'s hierarchical status.

Reasoning: The trial court erred by not granting NJC, Inc.’s motions for directed verdict and JNOV.

Neutral Principles vs. Deference Approach

Application: The case reaffirmed Florida's adoption of the deference approach, which requires civil courts to accept the authority of hierarchical church tribunals over property disputes.

Reasoning: Florida has adopted the deference approach, which originated from Watson v. Jones, establishing that local congregations cannot separate from a hierarchical church and retain property if they reject the church's authority.

Property Ownership in Hierarchical Churches

Application: The court determined that NJC, Sneads was affiliated with NJC, Inc., and under the hierarchical structure, the property belonged to NJC, Inc.

Reasoning: NJC, Sneads was found to be affiliated with NJC, Inc., and under the hierarchical property structure, the property belongs to NJC, Inc.