Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Gulliver Schools, Inc. v. Snay
Citations: 137 So. 3d 1031; 2013 WL 5676688; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16108Docket: No. 3D13-1952
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 10, 2013; Florida; State Appellate Court
Gulliver Schools, Inc. and School Management Systems, Inc.’s Amended Motion to File Briefs and Appendices Under Seal has been deemed facially insufficient and is therefore denied. The denial is without prejudice, allowing the parties the opportunity to submit a revised motion that meets the sealing criteria established in Barron v. Fla. Freedom Newspapers, 531 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1988), as well as in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case of BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo Int% Ltd. So.3d. Fla. 3d DCA 2009.