You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Southeast Milk/Zurich North America v. Fisher

Citations: 135 So. 3d 582; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5432; 2014 WL 1415204Docket: No. 1D13-4411

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; April 14, 2014; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this workers’ compensation case, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) appeals a decision by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) granting temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits to a Claimant for a specific period in 2013. The E/C contends that the JCC erred by not assessing whether the Claimant was discharged for misconduct, as required by Florida Statutes Section 440.15(4)(e), which precludes TPD benefits if the termination is due to misconduct. The Claimant, who was injured on the job and placed on light duty, was terminated after failing to attend mandated safety training sessions, a violation of company policy. The JCC’s position that TPD benefits were unaffected by the termination's cause was found legally incorrect. Consequently, the appellate court reversed the decision and remanded the case for the JCC to determine if the termination was due to statutory misconduct and to amend the order accordingly. The decision was unanimous among the judges involved in the appeal.

Legal Issues Addressed

Award of Temporary Partial Disability Benefits

Application: Temporary partial disability benefits should not be awarded if the Claimant is discharged for misconduct, as this would legally prohibit the payment of such benefits.

Reasoning: The JCC asserted that the award of TPD benefits would remain unchanged even if the Claimant was found to be terminated for misconduct. This assertion was incorrect, as termination for misconduct legally prohibits TPD benefits.

Judicial Oversight in Workers’ Compensation Cases

Application: The Judge of Compensation Claims must address all defenses raised by the Employer/Carrier, including those related to alleged statutory misconduct by the Claimant.

Reasoning: The E/C raised a relevant defense regarding the Claimant’s alleged statutory misconduct, which the JCC failed to address.

Termination for Misconduct under Florida Statutes Section 440.15(4)(e)

Application: The Judge of Compensation Claims must determine if the Claimant's termination was due to misconduct, which would disqualify him from receiving temporary partial disability benefits.

Reasoning: The E/C argues that the JCC incorrectly failed to determine whether the Claimant was discharged for misconduct, as mandated by section 440.15(4)(e) of the Florida Statutes (2012), which states that TPD benefits are not payable if the termination is due to misconduct.