Narrative Opinion Summary
The court reversed the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge in the case of Rebel Distributors, Inc. et al. v. LUBA Workers’ Comp. et al. (12-909), citing the rationale from the prior decision. Judgment was rendered in favor of Prejean’s Wholesale Meats, Inc. and LUBA Casualty Insurance Company, granting a peremptory exception of no right of action. Consequently, the claims of Rebel Distributors Corporation, Inc. d/b/a Physician Partner and Pharmacy Partner were dismissed. All costs associated with the appeal are assessed against Rebel Distributors Corporation, Inc. d/b/a Physician Partner and Pharmacy Partner. The decision is noted as "REVERSED AND RENDERED."
Legal Issues Addressed
Assessment of Appeal Costssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The costs associated with the appeal were assessed against Rebel Distributors Corporation, Inc. d/b/a Physician Partner and Pharmacy Partner.
Reasoning: All costs associated with the appeal are assessed against Rebel Distributors Corporation, Inc. d/b/a Physician Partner and Pharmacy Partner.
Final Disposition: Reversed and Renderedsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The final disposition of the case was noted as 'REVERSED AND RENDERED,' indicating a complete overturn and issuance of a new judgment.
Reasoning: The decision is noted as 'REVERSED AND RENDERED.'
Peremptory Exception of No Right of Actionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Judgment was rendered in favor of Prejean’s Wholesale Meats, Inc. and LUBA Casualty Insurance Company by granting a peremptory exception of no right of action, leading to the dismissal of the claims.
Reasoning: Judgment was rendered in favor of Prejean’s Wholesale Meats, Inc. and LUBA Casualty Insurance Company, granting a peremptory exception of no right of action.
Reversal of Workers' Compensation Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reversed the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge, indicating that the prior decision's rationale was applicable to this case.
Reasoning: The court reversed the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge in the case of Rebel Distributors, Inc. et al. v. LUBA Workers’ Comp. et al. (12-909), citing the rationale from the prior decision.