You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Timeus v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Citations: 127 So. 3d 834; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18923; 2013 WL 6224039Docket: No. 3D13-1462

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; November 26, 2013; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The final judgment of foreclosure is reversed due to an improper earlier entered default. Citing the case of Visoly v. Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan, the court emphasizes that a default resulting from noncompliance with a court order must demonstrate that the failure was "deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority." The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Reversal of Foreclosure Judgment

Application: The court reversed the final judgment of foreclosure because the default was improperly entered.

Reasoning: The final judgment of foreclosure is reversed due to an improper earlier entered default.

Standard for Default Entry

Application: The standard for entering a default requires evidence that the failure to comply with a court order was deliberate and showed contumacious disregard for the court's authority.

Reasoning: A default resulting from noncompliance with a court order must demonstrate that the failure was 'deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority.'