You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Jailen Ruise v. State of Florida

Citation: Not availableDocket: 20-0856

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 16, 2020; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Jailen Ruise appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Baker County, presided over by Judge Mark W. Moseley. The First District Court of Appeal of Florida reviewed the case and upheld the lower court's ruling, issuing a per curiam decision affirming the judgment. The appellate panel included Chief Judge RAY and Judges BILBREY and JAY, all of whom concurred with the affirmation. The decision is not final and may be subject to modification pending any timely motions filed under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331. Ruise represented himself in the appeal, while the State was represented by Attorney General Ashley Moody.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review and Per Curiam Affirmance

Application: The First District Court of Appeal conducted a review of the lower court's decision and issued a per curiam affirmance, indicating unanimous agreement among the judges without providing a detailed opinion.

Reasoning: The First District Court of Appeal of Florida reviewed the case and upheld the lower court's ruling, issuing a per curiam decision affirming the judgment.

Potential for Modification of Appellate Decision

Application: The appellate decision is not immediately final, allowing for the possibility of modification if timely motions are filed in accordance with specific Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Reasoning: The decision is not final and may be subject to modification pending any timely motions filed under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Pro Se Representation in Appellate Proceedings

Application: Jailen Ruise represented himself in the appeal process, demonstrating the court's allowance for individuals to proceed without legal representation in appellate matters.

Reasoning: Ruise represented himself in the appeal, while the State was represented by Attorney General Ashley Moody.