Narrative Opinion Summary
Ricky Lee Murray appealed his conviction from the 20th District Court of Milam County. The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, reviewed the case and determined that there were no reversible errors in the trial court's judgment. Consequently, the court affirmed the conviction. Additionally, since Murray is indigent and cannot pay court costs, the court did not impose any adjudication of costs.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court's Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court upheld the conviction from the lower court after finding no reversible errors.
Reasoning: Consequently, the court affirmed the conviction.
Review of Convictions on Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed the trial court's judgment to determine if any reversible errors were present.
Reasoning: The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, reviewed the case and determined that there were no reversible errors in the trial court's judgment.
Waiver of Court Costs for Indigent Defendantssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court did not impose court costs on the appellant due to his indigent status.
Reasoning: Additionally, since Murray is indigent and cannot pay court costs, the court did not impose any adjudication of costs.