You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Jesus Alberto Mireles v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 08-19-00221-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; January 8, 2020; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas grants Genesis Stephens an extension to file the Reporter’s Record until February 7, 2020, in the case of Jesus Alberto Mireles, Appellant, against the State of Texas. The Court specifies that no further requests for extension will be considered. Genesis Stephens, the Official Court Reporter for the 384th District Court of El Paso County, is ordered to prepare and submit the Reporter’s Record by the specified deadline. This order was issued on January 9, 2020, and signed by the panel including Chief Justice Alley and Justices Rodriguez and Palafox.

Legal Issues Addressed

Duties of Court Reporters

Application: The court reporter is mandated by the court to prepare and submit the required records within the set timeframe, as highlighted by the order to Genesis Stephens.

Reasoning: Genesis Stephens, the Official Court Reporter for the 384th District Court of El Paso County, is ordered to prepare and submit the Reporter’s Record by the specified deadline.

Extension of Time for Filing Court Records

Application: The court has the authority to grant extensions for filing court documents, such as the Reporter’s Record, and it exercised this authority by granting an extension until February 7, 2020.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas grants Genesis Stephens an extension to file the Reporter’s Record until February 7, 2020, in the case of Jesus Alberto Mireles, Appellant, against the State of Texas.

Finality of Court Orders on Extensions

Application: The court emphasized the finality of its decision regarding extensions by stating that no further requests for extensions will be considered.

Reasoning: The Court specifies that no further requests for extension will be considered.