Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
John Washington, Karen Clark, Matthew Roach, Kimberly Gates, and TUV Rheinland AIA Services, LLC v. Onecis Insurance Company
Citation: Not availableDocket: 14-19-00807-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; December 30, 2019; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Motion to Supplement and Motion to Seal were both denied in the case of John Washington et al. v. OneCIS Insurance Company, decided by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals on December 31, 2019. The appellee requested to seal certain exhibits but failed to provide a permanent sealing order compliant with Rule 76a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The court noted that the sealing order must include specific reasons for sealing, identify the exact records to be sealed, and establish the duration of the sealing. The appellee has 30 days from the order's date to submit a proper sealing order, or the motion will be denied. Additionally, the request to supplement the appellate record with an exhibit and deposition not included in the original proceedings was denied. The panel for this decision consisted of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.