You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in Re George Weimer, Bob Roberts, Jr., James Hughes, Dustin Navarro, Jose Perez, Morris Salzman, Gordon Hitzfelder, Brian Sullivan and Bonnie Tapp

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-19-00750-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 12, 2019; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, issued a memorandum opinion regarding the petition for writ of mandamus filed by relators George Weimer and others on October 24, 2019. After reviewing the petition and associated records, the court determined that the relators were not entitled to the requested relief. Consequently, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a). This case originates from Cause No. CV-XX-XXXXXXX, involving the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District versus Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, with the Honorable M. Rex Emerson presiding in the 198th Judicial District Court of Bandera County, Texas.

Legal Issues Addressed

Jurisdiction and Parties Involved

Application: The case involves jurisdictional matters between local water authorities, highlighting a dispute managed by the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 1.

Reasoning: This case originates from Cause No. CV-XX-XXXXXXX, involving the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District versus Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, with the Honorable M. Rex Emerson presiding in the 198th Judicial District Court of Bandera County, Texas.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a)

Application: The court evaluated the petition for writ of mandamus and determined that the relators did not meet the necessary criteria for relief, resulting in the denial of the petition.

Reasoning: After reviewing the petition and associated records, the court determined that the relators were not entitled to the requested relief. Consequently, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a).