You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in Re George Weimer, Bob Roberts, Jr., James Hughes, Dustin Navarro, Jose Perez, Morris Salzman, Gordon Hitzfelder, Brian Sullivan and Bonnie Tapp

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-19-00750-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 12, 2019; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

On October 24, 2019, relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas. After reviewing the petition and the accompanying record, the court determined that the relators did not qualify for the relief they sought. Consequently, the petition for the writ of mandamus was denied on November 13, 2019. This case is related to Cause No. CV-XX-XXXXXXX, which involves the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District versus the Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, currently pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, presided over by Judge M. Rex Emerson. The order was issued by Justice Liza A. Rodriguez and recorded by Clerk of Court Michael A. Cruz.

Legal Issues Addressed

Case Relation and Jurisdiction

Application: The case is connected to an ongoing matter in the 198th Judicial District Court, illustrating jurisdictional context and related litigation.

Reasoning: This case is related to Cause No. CV-XX-XXXXXXX, which involves the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District versus the Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 1, currently pending in the 198th Judicial District Court.

Judicial Review Process

Application: The Fourth Court of Appeals conducted a review of the petition and record to assess the eligibility for the requested legal relief.

Reasoning: After reviewing the petition and the accompanying record, the court determined that the relators did not qualify for the relief they sought.

Writ of Mandamus

Application: The court determined that the relators did not meet the necessary criteria to qualify for a writ of mandamus, resulting in the denial of their petition.

Reasoning: After reviewing the petition and the accompanying record, the court determined that the relators did not qualify for the relief they sought.