You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Richard Raley and Raley Holdings, LLC v. Daniel K. Hagood, P.C. and Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith & UHL, LLP

Citation: Not availableDocket: 05-18-00914-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 5, 2019; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

On November 6, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas addressed the case involving appellants Richard Raley and Raley Holdings, LLC, against appellees Daniel K. Hagood, P.C., and Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith UHL, LLP. The court considered unopposed motions from both parties: the appellants sought permission to file a post-submission letter brief, while the appellees sought to respond to that brief. The motions were intended to discuss recent case law from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals relevant to the appeal. However, the court denied both motions as moot, having already issued its opinion in the case on the same day. The order was signed by Justice Amanda L. Reichek.

Legal Issues Addressed

Consideration of Recent Case Law

Application: The parties intended to discuss recent case law from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court found this unnecessary given the issuance of its opinion.

Reasoning: The motions were intended to discuss recent case law from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals relevant to the appeal.

Motions for Leave to File Additional Briefs

Application: The court denied the motions for leave to file additional briefs as moot because it had already issued its opinion in the case.

Reasoning: The court considered unopposed motions from both parties: the appellants sought permission to file a post-submission letter brief, while the appellees sought to respond to that brief. However, the court denied both motions as moot, having already issued its opinion in the case on the same day.