You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. CLODETTE FLEURVIL, FALAND JEANTY, AS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF FAEYANA DESIRUS, A MINOR, EDZARE LAROSE JEAN

Citation: Not availableDocket: 18-4456

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 23, 2019; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Florida Department of Transportation against several appellees following a decision from the Circuit Court for Lee County. The appeal was presided over by Judge Keith R. Kyle, with representation by Carri S. Leininger for the appellant and Sorraya M. Solages-Jones and Scott B. Smith for the appellees. Filed on October 23, 2019, the appellate court rendered a per curiam dismissal of the appeal. This decision was influenced by precedents set in Florida Highway Patrol v. Jackson and Miami-Dade County v. Pozos, demonstrating the reliance on prior case law to guide current judicial outcomes. Judges Silberman, Morris, and Smith concurred with the dismissal. The court's decision remains non-final until the expiration of the period allocated for filing a rehearing motion, or until any such motion is adjudicated by the district court. The dismissal effectively upheld the lower court's decision, leaving the appellees' position unaltered by the appeal.

Legal Issues Addressed

Finality of Court Rulings

Application: The ruling is not considered final until the period to file a motion for rehearing has passed, and if such a motion is filed, it must be resolved by the district court.

Reasoning: The document notes that the ruling is not final until the time to file a rehearing motion has expired and, if filed, is determined by the district court.

Per Curiam Dismissal of Appeals

Application: The court applied a per curiam dismissal in this appeal, meaning the decision was made collectively and anonymously by the judges without issuing a detailed opinion.

Reasoning: The court concluded with a per curiam dismissal of the appeal, referencing previous case law, specifically Florida Highway Patrol v. Jackson and Miami-Dade County v. Pozos, which informed the decision.

Precedent in Appellate Decisions

Application: The decision to dismiss the appeal was influenced by precedent from previous cases, underscoring the role of prior case law in appellate decisions.

Reasoning: The court concluded with a per curiam dismissal of the appeal, referencing previous case law, specifically Florida Highway Patrol v. Jackson and Miami-Dade County v. Pozos, which informed the decision.