Narrative Opinion Summary
Cedric Hutchinson appeals a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, presided over by Judge Michelle Sisco. The appeal, filed under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2), has been affirmed by the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, with the opinion issued on September 18, 2019. The decision cites several precedential cases, including Clark v. State, McDonald v. State, and others, indicating that the court's ruling aligns with established legal principles. Judges Northcutt, Villanti, and LaRose concur with the decision. The document notes that it is not final until the time to file a rehearing motion has expired, or if such a motion is filed, until it is determined.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The District Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court, indicating the appellate court's agreement with the lower court's ruling.
Reasoning: Cedric Hutchinson appeals a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, presided over by Judge Michelle Sisco. The appeal, filed under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2), has been affirmed by the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, with the opinion issued on September 18, 2019.
Appeal Process under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal by Cedric Hutchinson was conducted under this specific rule, which governs certain appeals in criminal cases.
Reasoning: The appeal, filed under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2), has been affirmed by the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, with the opinion issued on September 18, 2019.
Concurrence of Appellate Judgessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: All judges on the panel concurred with the decision, demonstrating unanimity in the appellate court's ruling.
Reasoning: Judges Northcutt, Villanti, and LaRose concur with the decision.
Finality of Appellate Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision is not considered final until the period for filing a rehearing motion has passed, or any such motion is resolved, ensuring due process.
Reasoning: The document notes that it is not final until the time to file a rehearing motion has expired, or if such a motion is filed, until it is determined.