Narrative Opinion Summary
Mark Andrew Kalina's appeal (Case No. 2D18-5059) against the State of Florida was filed in the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, and was reviewed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appeal originated from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, presided over by Judge Chris Helinger. The court affirmed the lower court's decision without elaboration. The ruling referenced several prior decisions involving Kalina, indicating a pattern of similar cases leading to consistent outcomes. The judges on the panel—Casanueva, Lucas, and Rothstein-Youakim—concurred with the decision.
Legal Issues Addressed
Concurrence in Appellate Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The unanimous agreement among the judges on the appellate panel underscores the lack of controversy or differing opinions regarding the decision to affirm.
Reasoning: The judges on the panel—Casanueva, Lucas, and Rothstein-Youakim—concurred with the decision.
Precedential Impact of Consistent Judicial Outcomessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court referenced prior decisions involving Kalina to support its decision, indicating that the pattern of similar cases contributed to the consistency in outcomes.
Reasoning: The ruling referenced several prior decisions involving Kalina, indicating a pattern of similar cases leading to consistent outcomes.
Standard of Review in Florida Appellate Courtssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's decision to affirm without elaboration suggests that the appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's ruling, consistent with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
Reasoning: The appeal originated from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, presided over by Judge Chris Helinger. The court affirmed the lower court's decision without elaboration.