You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Randall Jones v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 03-19-00139-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; August 23, 2019; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves an appellant who challenged the dismissal of his murder charge from the 167th District Court of Travis County. The Texas Court of Appeals evaluated its jurisdictional authority, emphasizing that it typically reviews only judgments of conviction, as outlined in precedent cases such as Abbott v. State and Glaze v. State. The court determined that, in the absence of a conviction, it could not exercise jurisdiction over the appeal. The appellant's murder charge had been dismissed but later refiled under a different cause number, resulting in a conviction and a forty-year prison term. Additionally, the appellant faced separate convictions for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, for which he filed distinct appeals. The appellate court concluded that the appeal from the dismissal order lacked statutory basis and dismissed it for want of jurisdiction, with the decision filed on August 23, 2019.

Legal Issues Addressed

Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts in Criminal Cases

Application: The appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review an appeal from a dismissal order when there is no judgment of conviction.

Reasoning: The court clarified that the absence of a conviction precludes jurisdiction for the appeal.

Refiling of Criminal Charges

Application: A murder charge dismissed in one cause number can be refiled under a different cause number, leading to a subsequent conviction.

Reasoning: Jones's murder charge had been refiled in a different cause number, leading to a conviction and a forty-year prison sentence on February 12, 2019.

Separate Appeals for Distinct Convictions

Application: Separate appeals are filed for convictions on different charges, each assigned unique cause numbers.

Reasoning: Jones filed separate appeals for these convictions, which were assigned specific cause numbers.