You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

BERNICE PISACK, ETC. VS. B&C TOWING, INC. VS. THE CITY OF NEWARK EPTISAM PELLEGRINO, ETC. VS. NICK'S TOWING SERVICE, INC., A-5668-16T3 CHRISTOPHER WALKER, ETC. VS. ALL POINTS AUTOMOTIVE & TOWING, INC. (L-6501-13, L-1606-17 AND L-7929-13, MIDDLESEX AND BERGEN COUNTIES AND STATEWIDE)

Citation: Not availableDocket: A-2546-16T4/A-5399-16T3/A-5668-16T3

Court: New Jersey Superior Court; June 14, 2018; New Jersey; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves three consolidated appeals concerning non-consensual vehicle towing, focusing on the Predatory Towing Prevention Act (Towing Act), the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), and the Truth-In-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA). The plaintiffs, whose vehicles were towed without consent at police direction, challenged various fees imposed by towing companies. The appellate court addressed key issues: whether the Towing Act requires exhaustion of administrative remedies before litigation, the applicability of the Tort Claims Act immunity to towing fees, and the limits on permissible towing charges under the Towing Act. The court found that the Towing Act does not mandate administrative remedies and that towing companies lack immunity under the Tort Claims Act for non-consensual towing fees. Moreover, the TCCWNA applies to such towing, considering the towing bills as contracts. The court reversed prior rulings denying class certification and summary judgments, remanding the cases for further proceedings and allowing for potential class actions under the Towing Act, CFA, and TCCWNA. The decisions underscore the protection of consumer rights and the regulation of towing practices in New Jersey.

Legal Issues Addressed

Applicability of TCCWNA to Non-Consensual Towing

Application: Bills from towing companies for non-consensual towing are considered contracts under the TCCWNA, making it applicable.

Reasoning: The TCCWNA applies to non-consensual towing as the bills from towing companies are considered contracts and notices under the Act.

Class Action Suitability for Towing Act Claims

Application: Class actions may proceed for claims under the Towing Act, the CFA, and the TCCWNA.

Reasoning: Class actions may be suitable for claims under the Towing Act, CFA, and TCCWNA.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the Towing Act

Application: The Towing Act does not require plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies before filing a lawsuit.

Reasoning: The Towing Act does not mandate the exhaustion of administrative remedies or municipal dispute resolution procedures before pursuing claims.

Limitations on Towing Fees under the Towing Act

Application: The Towing Act restricts towing companies from charging fees not listed in the state-mandated fee schedule.

Reasoning: The Towing Act and its regulations restrict the services for which towing companies can impose charges.

Tort Claims Act Immunity in Non-Consensual Towing

Application: Towing companies do not enjoy immunity under the Tort Claims Act for fees charged during non-consensual towing at the direction of police.

Reasoning: The Tort Claims Act does not grant immunity for fees charged by towing companies for non-consensual towing.