You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

PHILLIP MICHAEL DORICS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Citation: Not availableDocket: 18-1299

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; August 9, 2019; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves Phillip Michael Dorics as the appellant against the State of Florida as the appellee, with the appeal originating from the Circuit Court for Manatee County, presided over by Judge Brian Iten. The opinion was filed on August 9, 2019, under Case No. 2D18-1299. The court, in a per curiam decision, affirmed the lower court's ruling. Judges VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM concurred in the decision. The public defender's office, represented by Howard L. Dimmig, II, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., was tasked with the defense for the appellant, while Ashley Moody, Attorney General, represented the appellee. The document notes that the decision is not final until the time to file a rehearing motion has expired or any filed motion has been resolved in the district court.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Rulings

Application: The appellate court upheld the ruling made by the Circuit Court for Manatee County, demonstrating the court's agreement with the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: The court, in a per curiam decision, affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Finality of Court Decisions

Application: The court's decision is not considered final until the timeframe for filing a rehearing motion has expired, or any such motion has been resolved.

Reasoning: The document notes that the decision is not final until the time to file a rehearing motion has expired or any filed motion has been resolved in the district court.

Role of Concurrence in Judicial Decisions

Application: Judges Villanti, Lucas, and Rothstein-Youakim all agreed with the per curiam decision to affirm the lower court's ruling.

Reasoning: Judges VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM concurred in the decision.