You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Guerrero v. 115 Cent. Park W. Corp.

Citation: 2019 NY Slip Op 27Docket: 7982

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; January 2, 2019; New York; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In Guerrero v. 115 Central Park West Corp., the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the Bronx Supreme Court's order denying plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment regarding liability under Labor Law § 240(1). The court found that significant triable issues of fact existed related to the circumstances of Hector Guerrero's accident. Guerrero claimed that the scaffolding shifted, causing his leg to fall into a gap between the scaffolding and a building. However, he failed to report this specific cause to his foreman on the day of the incident; instead, he later stated he was injured while lifting equipment, omitting any mention of the scaffolding. The court evaluated and rejected the plaintiffs' other arguments, concluding that they did not merit relief. The decision was entered on January 3, 2019, with no costs awarded.

Legal Issues Addressed

Assessment of Plaintiff's Alternative Arguments

Application: The court reviewed and dismissed the plaintiffs' other arguments for relief, indicating they were insufficient to warrant a different outcome.

Reasoning: The court evaluated and rejected the plaintiffs' other arguments, concluding that they did not merit relief.

Evidentiary Requirements for Summary Judgment

Application: The court denied the motion for partial summary judgment due to inconsistencies in the plaintiff's account of the accident, emphasizing the necessity of consistent and specific evidence for such motions.

Reasoning: Guerrero claimed that the scaffolding shifted, causing his leg to fall into a gap between the scaffolding and a building. However, he failed to report this specific cause to his foreman on the day of the incident.

Labor Law § 240(1) Liability

Application: The court assessed whether the plaintiff's account of the accident involving scaffolding shifting constituted a breach of Labor Law § 240(1), ultimately finding unresolved factual issues precluded summary judgment.

Reasoning: The court found that significant triable issues of fact existed related to the circumstances of Hector Guerrero's accident.