Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Victor Keith Wilson v. State
Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-18-00509-CR
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 19, 2018; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
In the case of Victor Keith Wilson v. The State of Texas, the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas addressed an appeal deemed frivolous by the appellant's court-appointed counsel, following the precedent set in Anders v. California. The appellant, representing himself, requested access to the appellate record to prepare a response and sought an extension to file this response. The court granted the initial request, ordering the trial court clerk to provide the appellant with the necessary record and extending the filing deadline. Subsequently, the appellant requested a second extension, citing incomplete access to the appellate record. The court approved this second extension, mandating that the trial court clerk provide a complete copy of the record, including all pertinent documents, within 10 days of the order. The clerk is also required to certify the delivery date to the Court within 15 days. The appellant must file his pro se response within 40 days of the order, with no further extensions permitted. The order was signed by Judge Harvey Brown on November 20, 2018.