Narrative Opinion Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals has dismissed the appeal in the case of Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 3 and Othal Brand, Jr. v. Kenneth Wilkins, originating from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. The dismissal aligns with the court's opinion, and the costs associated with the appeal are to be borne by the party that incurred them. The court's decision is to be certified for observance as of October 25, 2018.
Legal Issues Addressed
Allocation of Costs in Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The costs associated with the appeal are to be borne by the party that incurred them, implying that each party is responsible for its own legal expenses in this matter.
Reasoning: The dismissal aligns with the court's opinion, and the costs associated with the appeal are to be borne by the party that incurred them.
Certification of Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision of the court is to be certified for observance, which means it is formally recognized and must be adhered to as of a specified date.
Reasoning: The court's decision is to be certified for observance as of October 25, 2018.
Dismissal of Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Thirteenth Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal originating from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, which indicates that the appellate court found no grounds to overturn or alter the decision of the lower court.
Reasoning: The Thirteenth Court of Appeals has dismissed the appeal in the case of Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 3 and Othal Brand, Jr. v. Kenneth Wilkins, originating from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.