You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

JIMMY VELEZ v. ELIZABETH MONTALVO - VELEZ

Citation: 253 So. 3d 117Docket: 16-4794

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; August 10, 2018; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

This appellate case involves the appeal by a former husband against a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, specifically contesting the trial court's award of permanent alimony to the former wife. The trial court's decision failed to include the necessary factual findings required under Florida Statutes section 61.08(8), particularly concerning the imputation of income. The former husband had inconsistencies in his reported income, with claims of earning $1,300 monthly and contradictory statements about his financial obligations. The trial court had previously imputed income at $900 per week based on the husband's testimony, despite his tax returns indicating higher earnings. However, the court did not specify whether the imputed income applied to the permanent alimony award. The appellate court reversed the alimony portion of the judgment due to these deficiencies, emphasizing the need for explicit findings on income imputation and the necessity of determining that no other form of alimony is appropriate. The case was remanded for further proceedings to address these issues, while the final judgment of dissolution was otherwise affirmed. The decision underscores the importance of detailed judicial findings to support alimony awards and ensure compliance with statutory requirements.

Legal Issues Addressed

Imputation of Income for Alimony

Application: The appellate court found that the trial court failed to clarify its findings regarding both imputed and actual income, necessitating a reversal of the alimony award.

Reasoning: The court may have based the permanent alimony award on either imputed income or the former husband’s actual income, but it failed to clarify its findings on both imputation and actual net income, which is necessary for alimony determinations.

Mandatory Findings under Florida Statutes Section 61.08(8)

Application: The trial court did not explicitly find that no other form of alimony was fair and reasonable, which is a requirement under section 61.08(8), resulting in a reversal of the alimony award.

Reasoning: The law requires that when awarding permanent alimony, the court must explicitly find that no other form of alimony is fair and reasonable under the circumstances, as stated in section 61.08(8) of the Florida Statutes.

Statutory Requirements for Alimony Findings

Application: The trial court's failure to provide specific factual findings regarding the award of alimony led to a remand, as it hindered meaningful appellate review.

Reasoning: A trial court's failure to provide specific factual findings regarding alimony can hinder meaningful appellate review, potentially leading to reversal and remand, as established in Wabeke v. Wabeke.