You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Thomas Y. Crowe, individually etc.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 17-2409

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; June 25, 2018; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Duval County in the case involving The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company as the appellant and Thomas Y. Crowe, individually, and TYC Management, Inc. as the appellees. The appeal was heard by Judges Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, who all concurred with the decision. The ruling is not final and may be subject to further legal motions under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331. Representation for the appellant was provided by Kristina B. Pett and her colleagues from McDowell Hetherington LLP, while the appellees were represented by Philip M. Burlington of Burlington Rockenbach, P.A.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review of Circuit Court Decisions

Application: The First District Court of Appeal reviewed and affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Duval County, indicating the appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Duval County in the case involving The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company as the appellant and Thomas Y. Crowe, individually, and TYC Management, Inc. as the appellees.

Concurrence in Judicial Decision

Application: The decision of the appellate court was unanimous, as all three judges concurred, suggesting a strong agreement on the legal reasoning and outcome of the case.

Reasoning: The appeal was heard by Judges Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, who all concurred with the decision.

Status of Appellate Rulings

Application: The appellate ruling is not considered final and may be subject to further legal motions, indicating the possibility of additional legal proceedings.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final and may be subject to further legal motions under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.