You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Citation: Not availableDocket: 13-17-00167-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; June 7, 2018; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County in the case of Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, under trial cause number C-5429-14-A. The appellate court ruled that the trial court's decision should stand, with the costs of the appeal assigned to the appellants, Flores and Medina. The court instructed that this decision be certified for observance. The judgment was issued on June 7, 2018.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

Application: The appellate court affirmed the judgment of the lower court, indicating that the trial court's decision was upheld.

Reasoning: The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County in the case of Rebecca Leigh Flores and Fernando Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Assignment of Costs on Appeal

Application: The appellate court assigned the costs of the appeal to the appellants, which is a decision on who bears the financial burden of the appellate process.

Reasoning: The appellate court ruled that the trial court's decision should stand, with the costs of the appeal assigned to the appellants, Flores and Medina.

Certification of Judgment

Application: The court instructed that the decision be certified for observance, ensuring the judgment is recognized and enforced.

Reasoning: The court instructed that this decision be certified for observance.