You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

AMERICAN S GROUP, LLC v. ROBERT GLICKMAN

Citation: Not availableDocket: 17-2546

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; June 6, 2018; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case of American S Group, LLC v. Robert Glickman, the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Broward County, presided over by Judge Carol Lisa Phillips. The appeal (No. 4D17-2546) was related to a lower court ruling in case No. CACE16-019002, which had previously been contested by the appellant, American S Group, LLC. The court referenced a related case, Nat’l Am. Home, LLC v. Deutsche Nat’l Trust Co., in its ruling. The decision was made per curiam, indicating it was issued by the court collectively rather than by a specific judge. Judges Warner, Taylor, and Levine concurred with the decision. The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Decisions

Application: The Court of Appeal affirmed the decision made by the Circuit Court, indicating agreement with the lower court's ruling.

Reasoning: In the case of American S Group, LLC v. Robert Glickman, the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Broward County.

Concurrence of Judges

Application: Judges Warner, Taylor, and Levine expressed their agreement with the decision, indicating a unanimous or near-unanimous decision.

Reasoning: Judges Warner, Taylor, and Levine concurred with the decision.

Finality of Court Decisions

Application: The ruling is not considered final until the resolution of any timely filed motion for rehearing, leaving room for further legal action.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Per Curiam Decisions

Application: The decision was issued collectively by the judges without a single author, reflecting the unanimous agreement among the judges.

Reasoning: The decision was made per curiam, indicating it was issued by the court collectively rather than by a specific judge.