You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

AMERICAN S GROUP, LLC v. BIG CHOICE, LLC

Citation: Not availableDocket: 17-0792

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; May 24, 2018; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in the case of American S Group, LLC v. Big Choice, LLC. The appeal, numbered 4D17-792, was heard on May 24, 2018. The lower court's ruling was presided over by Judge John B. Bowman in case number CACE 16-018338 (02). The appellant, American S Group, LLC, was represented by attorney Andrey Solonenko from Miramar, while the appellee, Big Choice, LLC, was represented by Jordana Sarrell from Sarrell, Sarrell & Bender, P.L. of Boca Raton. The court's decision was per curiam, meaning it was issued collectively by the judges without a detailed opinion, and it included a note that the ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved. Judges Gerber, Gross, and Conner concurred with the affirmation.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court's Decision

Application: The appellate court affirmed the decision of the lower court, supporting the ruling made by the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit.

Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The decision of the appellate court is not considered final until any motions for rehearing are addressed, which may impact the ultimate resolution of the case.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Per Curiam Decisions

Application: The appellate court issued its decision in a per curiam format, indicating a collective agreement among the judges without a detailed individual opinion.

Reasoning: The court's decision was per curiam, meaning it was issued collectively by the judges without a detailed opinion.