You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

New San Antonio Specialty Hospital, LLC D/B/A LifeCare Hospitals of San Antonio v. Douglas B. Jackson

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-18-00110-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 27, 2018; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this appellate case, New San Antonio Specialty Hospital, LLC sought to challenge the trial court's decision denying its application for temporary injunctive relief. The appeal, filed on February 22, 2018, was directed to the Fourth Court of Appeals. However, the appellant failed to provide a signed, written order from the trial court, a requirement under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 34.5 for establishing appellate jurisdiction. The court emphasized that Judge’s Notes do not fulfill this requirement as they are not part of the official record. The appellate court issued an order requiring the appellant to demonstrate jurisdiction by April 16, 2018, cautioning that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the appeal. The court also allowed for the submission of a supplemental clerk’s record if needed to prove jurisdiction. Meanwhile, all procedural deadlines were suspended, and the court's clerk was instructed to disseminate copies of the order to all relevant parties. This procedural stance underscores the stringent adherence to jurisdictional prerequisites for appellate review.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appealable Order Requirement under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

Application: An appeal requires a signed, written order from the trial court to be considered by the appellate court.

Reasoning: The clerk’s record submitted to the Fourth Court of Appeals lacks a signed, written appealable order from the trial court, as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 34.5.

Jurisdictional Requirement for Appeals

Application: The appellant must demonstrate jurisdiction by providing necessary documentation, or the appeal will be dismissed.

Reasoning: The court ordered the appellant to respond by April 16, 2018, to demonstrate why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Procedural Suspension Pending Jurisdictional Clarification

Application: All procedural deadlines are suspended until jurisdiction is established.

Reasoning: All deadlines in the matter are currently suspended until further notice.

Status of Judge’s Docket Notes

Application: Judge’s Notes are not considered part of the official record and cannot substitute for a signed order.

Reasoning: The court clarified that Judge’s Notes do not constitute a part of the official record.