You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Jackson v. Charter Properties

Citation: 2018 Ohio 715Docket: 17AP-503

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals; February 26, 2018; Ohio; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves an appeal by Mark A. Jackson following a decision from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his motion to set aside a default judgment and granted Charter Properties' motion to strike his amended complaint. The dispute originated from a lease agreement between Jackson and Charter Properties, which led to eviction actions after nonpayment of rent and subsequent non-renewal of the lease. Jackson filed a complaint alleging libel, slander, and retaliatory actions under the Ohio Landlord and Tenant Act. After a summary judgment was granted to Charter Properties due to Jackson's failure to respond, his appeal was dismissed for not filing a brief. In 2017, Jackson sought relief from the judgment citing alleged misconduct by Charter Properties but failed to meet the GTE Automatic Electric test required under Civ.R. 60(B). The appellate court reviewed the denial of his motion for abuse of discretion and found no evidence of such, affirming the lower court's decision and the judgment against Jackson.

Legal Issues Addressed

Abuse of Discretion Standard in Reviewing Civ.R. 60(B) Motions

Application: The appellate court reviews the trial court's decision to deny a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for abuse of discretion, which requires a showing that the decision was unreasonable or arbitrary.

Reasoning: The appellate court reviews denials of such motions for abuse of discretion, which implies an unreasonable or arbitrary court attitude.

Granting of Motion to Strike an Amended Complaint

Application: The trial court granted the motion to strike Jackson's amended complaint since the issues had been conclusively resolved over a year prior.

Reasoning: The trial court denied Jackson's motion for relief and granted the motion to strike, stating that the matter had already been conclusively resolved over a year prior.

Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment under Civ.R. 60(B)

Application: The court evaluates the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment based on the three-prong test established in GTE Automatic Electric.

Reasoning: To succeed in a Civ.R. 60(B) motion, a movant must meet a three-prong test established in GTE Automatic Elec., showing: 1) a meritorious defense or claim, 2) entitlement to relief under one of the specified grounds, and 3) that the motion was made within a reasonable time.