You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Solomon Lemuel Perry v. New Penn Financial APD/Austin Police Dept. Constable Pct. 5 Bharath Vasudevan And Hill Country Property Management

Citation: Not availableDocket: 03-17-00500-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 2, 2017; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Solomon Lemuel Perry filed a pro se appeal regarding a temporary restraining order issued by the district court on July 17, 2017. The Texas Court of Appeals requested clarification on the jurisdictional basis for the appeal by August 28, 2017, warning Perry that failure to respond could lead to dismissal. No response was received from Perry. The court noted that appeals are typically limited to final judgments and certain interlocutory orders specified by the Texas Legislature. A temporary restraining order is generally not considered an appealable judgment, and no statute allows for an interlocutory appeal on such orders. After reviewing the case record, the court determined it lacked jurisdiction to proceed with the appeal and subsequently dismissed it. The dismissal was issued by Justice Bob Pemberton, with Chief Justice Rose and Justice Goodwin concurring, on November 2, 2017.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appealability of Temporary Restraining Orders

Application: The court determined that a temporary restraining order is not an appealable judgment and dismissed the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction.

Reasoning: A temporary restraining order is generally not considered an appealable judgment, and no statute allows for an interlocutory appeal on such orders.

Failure to Respond to Jurisdictional Inquiry

Application: Perry's failure to respond to the court's inquiry about the jurisdictional basis for his appeal contributed to the dismissal of his appeal.

Reasoning: The Texas Court of Appeals requested clarification on the jurisdictional basis for the appeal by August 28, 2017, warning Perry that failure to respond could lead to dismissal. No response was received from Perry.

Jurisdiction of Appeals

Application: The court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a temporary restraining order.

Reasoning: The court noted that appeals are typically limited to final judgments and certain interlocutory orders specified by the Texas Legislature.