You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Miami-Dade County v. Lansdowne Mortgage, LLC

Citation: 235 So. 3d 960Docket: 16-1046

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 18, 2017; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a dispute over lien priority, Miami-Dade County challenged a final judgment of foreclosure favoring Lansdowne Mortgage, LLC. The County contended that the trial court erred in prioritizing Lansdowne's mortgage, recorded in September 2007, over the County's homestead tax lien, recorded in January 2014, which arose from improper homestead benefits. The trial court had initially ruled in favor of Lansdowne, relying on Florida's recording statute (section 695.01(1)), which generally prioritizes earlier-recorded liens. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, emphasizing that under Florida Statute section 197.122(1), tax liens are deemed superior to other liens. The court dismissed Lansdowne’s claim that section 196.161 dictated the priority, affirming that it did not impact the precedence of homestead tax liens. Consequently, the appellate court determined that the County's tax lien was superior and remanded the case for proceedings consistent with this finding, rejecting Lansdowne's additional arguments as lacking merit.

Legal Issues Addressed

Application of Florida Recording Statute Section 695.01(1)

Application: The trial court initially applied this statute to determine lien priority, favoring the earlier-recorded mortgage over the County's tax lien, which was later reversed by the appellate court.

Reasoning: The trial court ruled in favor of Lansdowne, citing Florida’s recording statute (section 695.01(1)).

Interpretation of Section 196.161 in Relation to Homestead Tax Liens

Application: The appellate court rejected Lansdowne’s argument that Section 196.161 governed the priority of liens, affirming that it did not alter the superior status of homestead tax liens.

Reasoning: Lansdowne contended that section 196.161 governed the priority in this case, but the court found that it did not affect the priority of homestead tax liens over other liens.

Priority of Tax Liens under Florida Statute Section 197.122(1)

Application: The appellate court held that tax liens, including those arising from improper homestead benefits, take precedence over other liens on a property.

Reasoning: The County argued that the trial court’s decision violated section 197.122(1) of the Florida Statutes, which stipulates that all taxes imposed are a first lien, superior to other liens on the property.