You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Robertson v. Brookdale Hosp. Med. Ctr.

Citations: 2017 NY Slip Op 6204; 153 A.D.3d 743; 59 N.Y.S.3d 485Docket: 2015-03938

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; August 16, 2017; New York; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case of Robertson v. Brookdale Hospital Medical Center, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court addressed a discovery dispute in a medical malpractice lawsuit. The plaintiff, acting as the administrator of the decedent's estate, sought to compel the disclosure of occurrence reports related to the decedent's falls at a nursing home. The lower court had denied this request, siding with the nursing home, which argued that the reports were privileged under statutes protecting medical quality review documents. On appeal, the court reversed this decision, finding that the nursing home did not meet its burden to demonstrate that the reports were generated as part of its Quality Assurance Committee's activities. Consequently, the appellate court granted the plaintiff's motion for disclosure and denied the nursing home's request for a protective order. The court underscored the necessity for entities claiming privilege to substantiate their claim with appropriate evidence. The decision resulted in the release of the occurrence reports to the plaintiff, while other arguments from both parties were deemed unnecessary to address in light of this resolution.

Legal Issues Addressed

Burden of Proof for Asserting Privilege

Application: The ruling clarified that the burden of proof lies with the entity claiming a privilege, requiring them to provide evidence that documents were created in compliance with relevant statutes.

Reasoning: The ruling emphasized that the burden lies with the entity claiming privilege to prove that the documents were created in line with relevant statutes and that mere assertion of privilege is insufficient without proper supporting evidence.

Discovery in Medical Malpractice Cases

Application: The appellate court addressed the issue of discovery concerning occurrence reports in a medical malpractice case, reversing the lower court's decision and granting the plaintiff's motion to compel disclosure.

Reasoning: The appellate court reversed the lower court's order, granting the plaintiff's motion to compel disclosure of the reports and denying the nursing home's request for a protective order.

Privilege for Medical Quality Review Documents

Application: The court evaluated the nursing home's claim that the occurrence reports were protected under statutory privileges, ultimately finding the claim unsupported due to insufficient evidence of the reports' connection to Quality Assurance Committee activities.

Reasoning: The court found that the nursing home failed to adequately demonstrate that the reports were generated as part of its Quality Assurance Committee's activities, which would qualify them for protection under Public Health Law and Education Law.