Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Merino v. Pennymac Corp.
Citation: Not availableDocket: 17-0615
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; July 26, 2017; Florida; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The Third District Court of Appeal in Florida issued an opinion on July 26, 2017, regarding case No. 3D17-615, involving appellant Claudia V. Merino and appellee PennyMac Corp. The appeal stemmed from a non-final order issued by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, where Merino's motion to quash service of process was denied. Subsequently, PennyMac voluntarily dismissed the underlying foreclosure action without prejudice and filed a release of lis pendens in the trial court. Merino did not respond to this notice. As the underlying action was dismissed, the court deemed the appeal moot and consequently dismissed it.